(June 3, 2011 at 2:12 am)Dean-o Wrote: And when I say no clue, I mean no fucking clue.
Let me give you a few examples from a debate (if you could actually call it that) I had tonight.
Here are some quotes from one Christian:
Quote:god created 2 sets of humans, first were the partial humanoids, that were both male and female
what i am saying is there was monkey men, then adam and eve
the blood from the shroud of turin is AB negative
Adam was the first angel hybrid
wasn't there somewhere in the bible that God told Adam to take a look at the animals for a mate and he like said no way, so Eve was created
Animals must have been more evolved by that time, to mate with Adam
By the way, Every single line was a single post by that specific Christian. She was just so confused by a simple discussion on Macro-evolution and abiogenesis that she just went off on a random tangent that confused everyone else. It got to the point that even other creationists were ignoring her posts.
Here's a quote from another Christian in that debate:
Quote:Did any of Lenski's E coli bacteria evolve into a different species, say - a fruit fly?
This one had enormous trouble understanding that the history of evolution from a single organism to humanity took a very long time. Not just 20 years.
Defining a clue as in his argument, is i think bringing up a subject of evolution from a single organism to humanity; which a particular person didn't have a clue about.
So the clue in the post is about bringing up an argument that someone didn't have a "clue" about.
So my response: I think it's safe to say it's impossible to talk to a christian with a "clue". Is incorrect right?
tackattack, you got me.
Religion is like a Penis, you shouldn't whip it out in public and you shouldn't shove it down your child's throat.