(January 1, 2017 at 11:47 pm)Jello Wrote:(January 1, 2017 at 11:34 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote: Obviously not the philosophical type.
I am referring to political rights and human rights.
- No woman has the right to have an abortion using other people's money.
- A woman only has the right to have such services on fair and equal grounds. Be it monetary earnings or whatever health services she has available.
This is an extremely simple concept. Contraception is available and it is not expensive. If you cannot make the right decisions in life, I refuse to correct the faults of thousands of strangers and promote their lack of discipline.
And what if a woman is raped? Would you seriously try to charge someone to get an abortion based off of that?
. . . seriously?
It is rape, my answer is obvious to that. Take the non-aggression principle to its logical conclusion.
Somebody rapes somebody and obviously the rapist is apart of society; unless he/she is an inter-dimensional alien which turns it into a fuck-fest at this point. But of course a means of undoing the wrong is acceptable through service providers, charity or something of the kind. But this circumstance alone would not justify that everybody be shielded from the horrors of life. I understand the impact of rape but what about the impact of those who suffer from faults of their own. Should we as a society be forced to pay for their idiocy?
Ut supra, ita inferius
![[Image: 0c112e9da4d42c24a073c335a3e38de1_zpsezmp...g~original]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1297.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fag22%2FComrade_Mei-Ling%2F0c112e9da4d42c24a073c335a3e38de1_zpsezmp8izf.jpg~original)
Uƚ ƨuqɿɒ, iƚɒ inʇɘɿiuƨ