(January 2, 2017 at 12:31 am)ComradeMeow Wrote:(January 1, 2017 at 11:47 pm)Jello Wrote: And what if a woman is raped? Would you seriously try to charge someone to get an abortion based off of that?
. . . seriously?
It is rape, my answer is obvious to that. Take the non-aggression principle to its logical conclusion.
Somebody rapes somebody and obviously the rapist is apart of society; unless he/she is an inter-dimensional alien which turns it into a fuck-fest at this point. But of course a means of undoing the wrong is acceptable through service providers, charity or something of the kind. But this circumstance alone would not justify that everybody be shielded from the horrors of life. I understand the impact of rape but what about the impact of those who suffer from faults of their own. Should we as a society be forced to pay for their idiocy?
Whilst you think it may have seemed obvious, from over here it just looked like you wanted to charge people for abortions, therefore, i asked the question to find out whether that extended to rape victims. Thanks for answering the question
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. For if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes unto you."
