(January 4, 2017 at 11:57 am)Astonished Wrote: Are you fucking kidding me? The Westboro Baptists are absolutely justified in doing what they do if the only criteria is the bible.Like what???
Quote: Their stance on homosexuality might actually be one of the few things in the bible that doesn't get contradicted anywhere else in it.Such as?
Quote:The problem is not their interpretation of the bible,Then have one of the provide book Chapter and verse. If they can not find a Christian command that coinsides with one from their religion or it has to be filtered down over several different books or verses then it is indeed a problem of interpretation.
Quote:the problem is the fucking bible itself. That's why it's incapable of being reformed, there's nothing to reform. You can't make a spiked suppository not cause damage just by numbing up the hole you shove it into.But again, without B,V,C they do not have supository nor the right to spike it.
Quote:So instead of making a complete jackass of yourself and using a No True Scotsmen fallacy,Please explain. As I see no true scotsman does not apply when there are rules defining what Christianity is and is not.
Quote:get with reality and understand that your bah-ble is incapable of being 'truth' and can't, by its very nature, lead you anywhere good.why not? because you say so? or is that just a empty statment of blind faith on your part?
Quote: I mean, really, explain how something written explicitly in that book is wrong if it's infalliblewhere in the bible has it ever said it is infallible?
Quote:, or if something later came along and reversed it, how god is supposed to be utterly perfect and never make mistakes and therefore never have to change his opinion. Go on, I dare you. Otherwise don't waste my fucking time.
1)The bible said God is perfect... Meaning with out sin.
2) what does a perceived error in scripture have to do with God? Do you believe the bible to be God? Then why would you assume the bible need be held to the same standard?
