(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: Hitler was raised a Christian but did not necessarily remain one. One needs to examine his modus operandi here. When he became Fuhrer he wanted complete control. He knew in order to achieve this that he would need the popular backing of the German people who were predominantly Christian. Hence his reason for invoking religion.
One only needs to examine the words of the man himself. When it comes to worldview and religion, examining a person's behavior means nothing. A religion or worldview is something you identify with enough to label yourself as such. Hitler labeled himself a Christian and never backed down on that. That is the end of the fucking story. Besides, he had enough political fodder to gain popular backing. Have you read nothing of his "rise" to power?
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: Which very neatly segued into the Jewish question too.
Baloney sandwich. What reason would he have for targeting Jews if he were not religious? If he were an atheist, for instance, he could have chosen nationality or class. Instead, he attacked a religion. Granted, it is a also a nationality, but he went for the religious side of it, for the most part.
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: So this was classic politicking on his part to ally the country with his vision.
Oh, really? Maybe it was what he actually believed. Otherwise, how do you explain his hatred?
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: Had the Church put up significant opposition to him, his tune would have changed.
No, he would have separated from the church and he would not have been the first ruler to separate from the popular church and then form his own.
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: So please let us not fall into the trap of assuming that he was Christian because he referenced it in a speech or there is a photo of him leaving a church. Means nothing. All he was ultimately concerned with was securing and maintaining absolute power. End of.
He didn't just reference it in speech and go to church. He was obsessed with religious artifacts. His men wore uniforms that made reference to god. He referenced it in Mein Kampf. He called himself a Christian. Let you not fall into the trap of deciding who is Christian and who isn't. If a guy came up to me wearing devil horns and spitting out pig's blood and told me he was a Christian, I would consider him a Christian.
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: No one is disputing his reference of Christianity.
You are disputing the veracity of his statements which were his own personal statements regarding his own beliefs and which are contrary to what you are trying to say here. Why do you even bother?
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: What I am suggesting is that there was an ulterior political motive at work here.
You must be a fundamentalist in disguise. Fundies hate it when a Christian is a bad guy.
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: The large body of evidence is rather ambiguous and contradictory which is why there is this eternal debate about his religious convictions.
No, this obnoxious debates rages on because religious people and deluded people don't like the idea of the boogeyman being Christian. Tough titty to them and you. He could have been a smurf for all I care, but he was not, he was a Christian.
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: And on the subject of Mein Kampf which sold more than ten million, all Hitler really cared about was the fact that it made him a millionaire. He couldn't care less whether anyone read it or not.
You're kidding, right? He didn't care if anyone read it? So, you are assuming that whilst he was in jail for a failed coup d'etat, he threw all of his effort into a book that he somehow foresaw would make him a millionaire? He just made it all up because his life's dream was to be a successful novelist?
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: Does that strike you as someone whose prouncements should be taken seriously ?
Listen, you can't follow up a load of assumptions about a dead man's motives that have no backing as far as the man's own claims are concerned with a question like that. Your fictional Hitler does not sound like someone who should be taken seriously. As it turns out, the real world Hitler was someone whose pronouncements should have been taken far more seriously than they were.
(June 25, 2011 at 4:12 am)twocompulsive Wrote: So my conclusion remains : he was only concerned with securing and maintaining absolute power. Everything else was superfluous to requirement.
Oh, I agree with you completely, but your "conclusion" has nothing to do with him being Christian. Also, your conclusion cannot be based on the religion issue as they are two separate matters. For example, I'm an atheist. Say all I care about is money. Does my lust for wealth cancel out my lack of belief in god? Obviously not.