So, are you at odds with freedom of choice in a free market economy there?
I love sex, and it is always a zillion times better with someone you love, mainly because for it to get to the love part, you have taken the time, and you understand each other a bit more, which leads to much better communication in (or out of) bed.
But sex qua sex is not the province of love alone. It feels good, lessens stress, promotes health (so long as you play safe) and has been a commodity since before Moses washed his loincloth.
What is wrong with providing a new economic opportunity? If those poor girls don't like it, they certainly don't have to go in for it, and if they do, won't they be better off in the long run? Maybe able to fund their education in order to do something more fulfilling in an inner level?
I love sex, and it is always a zillion times better with someone you love, mainly because for it to get to the love part, you have taken the time, and you understand each other a bit more, which leads to much better communication in (or out of) bed.
But sex qua sex is not the province of love alone. It feels good, lessens stress, promotes health (so long as you play safe) and has been a commodity since before Moses washed his loincloth.
What is wrong with providing a new economic opportunity? If those poor girls don't like it, they certainly don't have to go in for it, and if they do, won't they be better off in the long run? Maybe able to fund their education in order to do something more fulfilling in an inner level?
Trying to update my sig ...
