Prayer ... SERIOUSLY?!

[Statler Waldorf]

---

From the wiki (it's also interesting to read the part about their skeezy jab at Dawkins):

The scientific community considers 'creation science' to be pseudoscience which "does not use any scientific reasoning."[85][86] Consequently, scientific and scholarly organizations, including United States National Academy of Sciences, the Paleontological Society, Geological Society of America, Australian Academy of Science, and the Royal Society of Canada have issued statements against the teaching of creationism.[87] As a result, the National Center for Science Education, a science advocacy group, criticize AiG's promotion of non-science.[88][89][90] In direct response to AiG, No Answers in Genesis is a website maintained by members of the Australian Skeptics and retired civil servant John Stear for the purpose of rebutting claims made by AiG.[91] In June 2005, AiG-Australia staff accepted an invitation for an online debate[92] with representatives from the Australian Skeptics in Margo Kingston's section of the Sydney Morning Herald.[93] Also the website talk.origins includes scientific responses to claims made by AiG's authors.[94]
The Louisville Courier-Journal reported, "Cincinnati Zoo and the Creation Museum launched a joint promotional deal last week to draw attention to their holiday attractions."[7] But following an outcry of criticism, the zoo ended the relationship after two days.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Answers_in_...#Criticism

---

What! Newton, Bacon, Kepler, Boyle, Joule, Pasteur, Pascal, Galileo, Kircher, Linneaus, Dalton, Owen, Mendel, Fabre, Flemming, Carver, Ramsey, and Von Braun are all not real scientists!!? I guess being a "pseudo" scientists is a good thing.

I guess if you can't refute their arguments and scientific evidence, just pretend they are not allowed to even present their ideas huh?