RE: Ghostbusters did it again? Shushing down imdb boards
February 15, 2017 at 8:56 pm
(This post was last modified: February 15, 2017 at 9:13 pm by dyresand.)
(February 15, 2017 at 3:04 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote:(February 15, 2017 at 8:46 am)dyresand Wrote: The ghost busters movie was a racist dumb piece of shit movie.
It wasn't funny or good it was terrible. The fact that they took Ernie Hudsons character
in the ghostbusters movie he was well educated person (note i didn't black) and turned that character
into the most racist annoying stereotype.
Stop right there. Jones character was not a rewrite of Hudson - but hey, why would we assume it's a targeted caricature replacement unless there's an apriori assumption you've already made on the part of Hudson.
(February 15, 2017 at 8:46 am)dyresand Wrote: Note all the ghost busters had some type of college education and they were masters
in their fields in this is just... poor excuse for writing.
Really? My sister and mom watched that movie and came back talking about how cutting the academic jokes were, how the movie focused on friendship and ultimately how fun the whole endeavor was.
... Kind of like how the original Ghostbusters was for me!
Yeah, I first listened to sour grapetards like you regarding the new Ghostbusters. Until real people close to me actually saw it and contradicted the narrative pushed by Milo Yiannopolis.
I guess that's when I realized I had been had.
(February 15, 2017 at 8:46 am)dyresand Wrote: in all honesty they have the scripts from the movies 1 2 and 3 (which is a game) and could remake the movie series since the actors are getting older.
The Thing Prequel came from a prior script that wasn't done and it was AWFUL.
Score that as a counter argument of "well they had scripts!" Yeah, so did a follow up to one of the most famous of horror movies ever made.
I couldn't enjoy the film i got maybe 1 or 2 chuckles i didn't like it at all.
They had good actresses but.... the script was so poorly written
(February 15, 2017 at 5:00 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: I didn't like the first GB movie. I thought the editing paced the movie grossly too slow. For me it was an excruciating watch. Never watched the recent remake, apparently I missed nothing.
The original movie was meant to be a Dark comedy horror movie. It's pacing was slow because hey let's be realistic for a moment
you just can't say oh a ghost in the library to 10 minutes later hey were ghost busters

(February 15, 2017 at 3:04 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote:(February 15, 2017 at 8:46 am)dyresand Wrote: The ghost busters movie was a racist dumb piece of shit movie.
It wasn't funny or good it was terrible. The fact that they took Ernie Hudsons character
in the ghostbusters movie he was well educated person (note i didn't black) and turned that character
into the most racist annoying stereotype.
Stop right there. Jones character was not a rewrite of Hudson - but hey, why would we assume it's a targeted caricature replacement unless there's an apriori assumption you've already made on the part of Hudson.
(February 15, 2017 at 8:46 am)dyresand Wrote: Note all the ghost busters had some type of college education and they were masters
in their fields in this is just... poor excuse for writing.
Really? My sister and mom watched that movie and came back talking about how cutting the academic jokes were, how the movie focused on friendship and ultimately how fun the whole endeavor was.
... Kind of like how the original Ghostbusters was for me!
Yeah, I first listened to sour grapetards like you regarding the new Ghostbusters. Until real people close to me actually saw it and contradicted the narrative pushed by Milo Yiannopolis.
I guess that's when I realized I had been had.
(February 15, 2017 at 8:46 am)dyresand Wrote: in all honesty they have the scripts from the movies 1 2 and 3 (which is a game) and could remake the movie series since the actors are getting older.
The Thing Prequel came from a prior script that wasn't done and it was AWFUL.
Score that as a counter argument of "well they had scripts!" Yeah, so did a follow up to one of the most famous of horror movies ever made.
If you enjoyed the movie all rights too you but i have legitimate criticism of the movie. Ghost busters 2 in it's own right is a bad movie by standards but
even the original ghost busters had it's flaws but when you look at the new ghost busters and you watch for critical analysis you can automatic put it out there.
Paul Feige made a mistake Mellisa Mccarthy great actress funny but in this movie you can take a look at her previous work and you know even in the commercials she is always put into a position that various obvious getting harmed in some way so when she was getting slapped around it's like oh.. its not like i haven't seen this before (it would have been better if she hadn't for once). Then the slime part oh i got slime everywhere.. we know we could see it the actress got covered in slam. Then there is the shoot him in the dick....-sigh-.....really out of all the places not even oh hey let's cross streams <insert pee joke here> that is better written than shoot him in the dick. Then you have the stereo typical dumb male.. okay ill let paul feige have that one but... the CGI they used is something that came from haunted mansion the original effects that were used for the ghosts instead of something vibrant and colorful like a bright blue ghost that would have better instead of Disney's the ghost busters. I have legitimate critism of the movie it could have been better they have the right people just not the right script.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>