Hello everyone. Suppose that your definition of sufficient (whatever that may be) proof for the existence of a deity was satisfied. Also, suppose that the nature of this deity is completely different from the one described by human theists. Hence, assume that whatever objections you had to human theists' versions of god do not apply to this lifeform.
Now, would you accept the existence of this lifeform only and just go about your business? Would you like to interact with it and learn from it (this process would not have to be through religion or any form of worship)?
Hence, as members of the secular community, are you more opposed to how humanity has collectively chosen to enact and practice their god concepts than to the actual idea of a god-like being itself?
Now, would you accept the existence of this lifeform only and just go about your business? Would you like to interact with it and learn from it (this process would not have to be through religion or any form of worship)?
Hence, as members of the secular community, are you more opposed to how humanity has collectively chosen to enact and practice their god concepts than to the actual idea of a god-like being itself?
