RE: New York Times, CNN, others barred from press briefing
February 26, 2017 at 2:53 pm
(This post was last modified: February 26, 2017 at 2:54 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(February 25, 2017 at 3:38 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: An informed electorate is vital to a functioning democracy. I don't see how reducing available information aids informing the public.
I agree with you. At the same time, I don't see how anyone can say that the public is starved for information. if anything there is too much. If the NYT and CNN ceased to exist, I doubt they would be missed.
(February 25, 2017 at 3:38 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: The first step towards authoritarian government is muzzling the voices which would object.
Personally, I think there is a difference between snubbing certain journalists and censoring them. They are still free to print and say whatever they want.
(February 25, 2017 at 3:38 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: This is the action of a man afraid of what is written about him and seeking to allay those fears.
You could be right. It is also true that some journalists have publicly vowed to oppose the Trump administration. Perhaps his fear is that they will twist and distort his words and deeds. (Something they have already done.) Why should he give them ammunition to do so?
Anyway, that's pretty much all I have to say on the topic.