Debate: God Exists

[SuperSentient]

Again, without objective evidence, it deserves no attention, except by a psychologist.

what an empty foolish statement. have you not even been apart of this discussion to this point? What 'objective evidence' can one hope for when trying to vet a set of instructions? What don't yu understand that God only offers evidence in the way of the Holy Spirit and only if you follow the path He has laid out.

It's real simple, either one follows said directions or one does not. how do you annalize or rationalize a simple set of instructions?

If God says look here for me this way, and you look there your way, then by your actions are you not wanting to find nothing? Who are you to expect God to meet you on your terms?

That is the big problem. It is equivalent to the "invisible dragon in my garage" problem. You point out that God only speaks to those that accept his existence, no logic or reasoning to provide, which means you can't expect a critical thinker to accept it (at least on that way of looking at it). After all, you have to start on presupposition that God may not exist and deduce from empirical observations and accepted logic to get to that as a potential reasonable conclusion.