RE: Debate: God Exists
March 10, 2017 at 2:28 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2017 at 2:33 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(March 10, 2017 at 2:10 pm)pocaracas Wrote:(March 10, 2017 at 1:48 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Theist: If not for God, why is there something rather than nothing?
Atheist: There just is.
Theist:If not for God, why do causes produce regular effects?
Atheist: They just do.
Theist: If not for God, why does the universe have a rational order?
Atheist: It just does.
Theist: If not for God, how can abstract mathematics consistently describe does the concrete physical universe?
Atheist: Because it does.
Etc...etc...etc...
How about you prove that a god is required for any of those things.
No argument from ignorance allowed. (because that's a fallacious argument, you know...)
I have done so in so many places that I have grown weary of it. Besides there is a difference between proving with absolute certainty (especially, with people who deny to there are absolutes) and the best explanation. If you're going to say that God is not the best explanation then it is reasonable for me to ask with what are you making comparison?
