Neo-Scholastic Wrote:I'm not attempting to prove that God exists. I am saying that the existence of God is most plausible explanation for the most fundamental questions of human existence.
Is this actually the most plausible explanation, or is this explanation only plausible for people who choose to interpret "the most fundamental questions of human existence" through a theistic lens?
Neo-Scholastic Wrote:If you have no explanations for those things, then by default God is the best explanation.
With all due respect, if an individual does not have an explanation for "the most fundamental questions of human existence", then how is attributing the answers to a god any different from saying "I don't know"?