Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?

[trustyoursources]

However, that does not mean that the facts are false.

How can you post that meme and say that haha

---

I made it about 4 minutes and change before deciding you are a Poe.

Lenin died in 1924.  He was not sitting in Moscow in 1941 waiting for communications from besieged Leningrad!  He most assuredly was not expecting them from Trotsky who Stalin had murdered in Mexico in 1940 and who was thus NOT in command of Soviet Forces in the Leningrad area.  That was Lt. Gen. Popov.

Remember what I said about facts.

You really think that these "facts" and dates are right. Come on dude this is all a massive cover up by the global elites. This was decades ago almost no documentation is left for the public to access. Its all lies.

---

While history as we know it may not be entirely accurate, I wouldn't call it faith-based since we do have data points to piece together to form the story. There's also some guess-work involved for sure, and rational people will turn that into "I don't knows" and "maybes".

I have no idea how this becomes a religion, though. I should hope nobody treats it that way.

No history is just government prapaganda. they control the text books and the documents and relics. They decide what goes in the museums. Nothing is as it seems. I absolutely promise you no matter how ridiculous you might think my film is, its most likely more true then what the official lie is on the matter.