RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
March 15, 2017 at 12:47 am
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2017 at 12:50 am by trustyoursources.)
(March 15, 2017 at 12:42 am)Thena323 Wrote:(March 15, 2017 at 12:37 am)trustyoursources Wrote: I dont understant?
Wow, but you're quick!
You posted a link, but it's to a Youtube video, which I believe is permitted as a new member.
My apologies, Sir or Madam. I edited my post a few minutes ago.
Haha thank you for the welcome I am a documentary film maker just sharing my craft. If this is not permitted I will not do that anymore. Since this is an atheist forum I just though alternative history would be an interesting subject matter to engage in within the skeptic community.
(March 15, 2017 at 12:46 am)Fireball Wrote:(March 15, 2017 at 12:37 am)Jesster Wrote: And I'm here if you want to share some jokes. You started, so I can go next.
Why did Princess Diana cross the road?
She wasn't wearing a seat belt.
OH, fuck, that was wicked, Jess.
To address the OP, historians sort through the available evidence and try to figure out what is PROBABLY true, but they aren't 100% convinced. If you have some sort of grind with "accepted" history, you're going to have a tough go of it here (or anywhere- can you provide a CV of how many fora you've been evicted from for posting this sort of material?
I understand that its not a popular view but it is an appropriate one to discuss within the skeptical community I believe and it happens to be a view I am deeply interested in.
