Debate: God Exists

[Jesster]

Yes. We don't bother with proving someone else innocent to see if your defendant is innocent. We wait for positive evidence to see if your defendant is actually guilty before calling them so....This applies well to many claims. Don't accept a claim until you have enough positive evidence to believe it. Disproving another claim does not make your claim more noteworthy. "I don't believe it" is the default until shown otherwise.

Except theists are presenting positive evidence. We do not consider your objections to the evidence valid and the alternative explanations are not plausible to us.

The evidence you have provided so far is not sufficient. Until it is, I won't believe the claim. I don't care what you consider valid. You may have already convinced yourself, but that doesn't automatically convince others. Also, as previously stated several times before, alternate explanations are still not needed for others to not accept your claim.

Now either provide your positive evidence or get used to us not taking you seriously.