These ludicrous logical leapfrog games don't actually "prove" much beyond a need to reinforce what a person already wants to be true. Taken objectively and critically, they wouldn't be convincing to anyone who wasn't already convinced. It's little more than mental masturbation - a pleasant way to kill five minutes but hardly likely to rock someone else's world.
I suggest "why most arguments for God prove how desperate some people can be to prove God exists" as a more accurate title.
I suggest "why most arguments for God prove how desperate some people can be to prove God exists" as a more accurate title.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
