Deadliest religion ever?

[paulpablo]

You're asking me to provide a logical argument and treating this as a debate and expecting me to use deductive reasoning. I'm asking you to not be intentionally obtuse and to use a bit of common sense and inductive reasoning (and it's not as if it requires fucking much and you're not that dumb hence why you're being disingenuous as fuck).

Some things are more likely than other things. The fact that the most likely explanation when an anti-religious meme says no atheist was ever 'stoned to death' is that it is actually making a point about the fact that many people were stoned to death because of religion due to the biblical act as stoning..... the fact that that is the most likely explanation based on the context shouldn't need an explanation. You are not four fucking years old I shouldn't have to teach you to use basic common sense in context... f you think that that is not the most plausible interpretation and that all interpretations are equally plausible/implausible including the literal act of stoning then you're just a fucking idiot.

Either that or you're being intentionally obtuse or disingenuous as fuck. I think the latter makes more sense considering you do this shit all the time.

An anti-religious meme would have NO REASON to randomly talk about the act of throwing stones at people until they are dead for non-religious and non-biblical reasons. To randomly say no atheists throw stones at people makes no sense. It obviously means in the context of religion you fucking moron.

You are seriously pretending that an anti-religious meme isn't talking about biblical stoning when it mentions how an atheist has never 'stoned someone to death'.

I have never known such a persistently disingenuous cunt in all my life.

---

Ok I'll provide more reasoning and evidence ontop of what I've already provided

You say this like you don't even know the difference between reasoning and evidence. Those are not interchangeable things. An argument is not evidence. We're not talking about evidence here we're talking about my refusal to teach you how to read things in context like you're a child and your retarded insistence on asking me to provide 'proof' for an anti-religious meme talking about 'stoning to death' being something to do with religious stoning.

Your logic is faulty again.  Being a part of an meme about religion doesnt change the meaning of the words within the meme.

So for example....

This is a meme about Islam

"A non Muslim has never 'stoned to death" anybody ever."

This meme is incorrect.  The scare quotes don't indicate that the stoning to death is exclusively linked to Islamic beliefs.  A reader would have to jump to an assumption in order to think this is obviously only talking about stoning under Islam.

The truth is that people of all faiths and atheists have stoned people to death which isn't reflected in this meme relating to Islam or the meme previously posted by Min.

"No one was ever 'stoned to death' by an atheist" is also most likely incorrect and a statement I doubt it true.  The scare quotes don't indicate that the stoning to death is religious they just indicate an action and claim that atheists don't do this specific act.

I'm being very genuine and I don't believe my argument is moronic or obtuse.