(April 13, 2017 at 10:08 am)SteveII Wrote:(April 13, 2017 at 9:30 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: No, my views are on of objective study, rather than soaked in the narrow mindedness of, "I believe this to be true, so let's find ways, no matter how ridiculous they may be, to explain the nonsense parts. Then, when it's pointed out just how ridiculous the explanations are, we'll just say that you have to read it MY way."
Any characterizations I make on christianity comes from being raised in it, as well as what other christians have said.
You seem to paint with a broad brush and constantly avoid details of any kind. What specific doctrine have you "objectively studied" that you think that Christians have twisted meaning into?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_theology
Why would I care to post details of the differences one christian has from every other? I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Whatever I post, you'll just come back with some apologist's pap or default to the "You're not reading it right" bullshit.
You're beliefs have no leg to stand on. They're a combination of wishful thinking and emotional drivel with a BIG dose of ego thrown in. I won't argue point by point because I won't be dragged down to your level. I'll just sit and snipe at your ludicrous argument until it's no longer entertaining to me.
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam
