They've had many explode upon launch type of failures recently. If this is a solid fueled rocket, then there is not a whole lot for software to do during the initial lunch sequence, so I doubt it is a software failure. More likely they simply haven't mastered the solid fuel rocket technology.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 12, 2025, 12:43 am
Thread Rating:
Nork missile kerfuffle
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Nork missile kerfuffle - by vorlon13 - April 15, 2017 at 7:21 pm
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by The Industrial Atheist - April 15, 2017 at 7:23 pm
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by vorlon13 - April 15, 2017 at 7:24 pm
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by Jackalope - April 15, 2017 at 7:37 pm
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by Jackalope - April 15, 2017 at 7:40 pm
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by Pat Mustard - April 16, 2017 at 5:21 am
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by Aegon - April 16, 2017 at 7:35 am
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by chimp3 - April 15, 2017 at 7:48 pm
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by Joods - April 15, 2017 at 9:56 pm
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by vorlon13 - April 15, 2017 at 10:44 pm
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by Minimalist - April 15, 2017 at 11:19 pm
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by Isis - April 16, 2017 at 2:34 am
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by downbeatplumb - April 16, 2017 at 4:31 am
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by Anomalocaris - April 16, 2017 at 8:14 am
RE: Nork missile kerfuffle - by Brian37 - April 16, 2017 at 8:35 am
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)