RE: Our theists of all labels please answer....
April 24, 2017 at 8:57 am
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2017 at 9:06 am by Harry Nevis.)
(April 23, 2017 at 12:59 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:(April 23, 2017 at 12:48 pm)Thena323 Wrote: Oh, sure...'Cause the gobbleygook MK sucks up is the Really, Really, Real Deal.
Ha, ha....So, say ALL you motherfuckers.
Got anything BESIDES your stupid feelings/dumb-ass poetry, that justifies your claiming ultimate supremacy and "truthiness" over CL's brand of Catholic Voodoo?
I have a lot of evidence. A lot that I have not shown. But let me know when you are interested. Every thread that I begin to talk about a bit of these proofs, people, spiral out of control to demanding proof for God in the first place.
No, you don't. You have nothing but assertions and babbling posts.
(April 23, 2017 at 1:42 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: You said to discuss with other faiths. I am saying we all agree in the need of such figures...so then I reasoned to them, one of many reasons I believe the Quran is accurate and true.
(April 23, 2017 at 1:41 pm)Brian37 Wrote: YEP, BINGO and that is my point. So again, if that is the case that all religions believe in the need, then what neutral filter do humans have that everyone can use to determine what is subjective opinion vs universal fact?
Reason. Reason with genuine honest reflection always leads to the truth, if it slips, it will know it slipped eventually because it is humble enough to recognize it's faults.
(April 23, 2017 at 1:41 pm)Brian37 Wrote: YEP, BINGO and that is my point. So again, if that is the case that all religions believe in the need, then what neutral filter do humans have that everyone can use to determine what is subjective opinion vs universal fact?
Reason. Reason with genuine honest reflection always leads to the truth, if it slips, it will know it slipped eventually because it is humble enough to recognize it's faults.
It's not working for you.
(April 23, 2017 at 2:08 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Why ask for reasons if you are going to simply dismiss them and not discuss them?
Seems like he did discuss them. You just think they're worth more attention then they actually are.
(April 23, 2017 at 6:10 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: From this thread and repeated posts found elsewhere, Brian37 has shown no interest in why theists hold the beliefs they do. Instead he foolishly thinks the plurality of religions, sects and denominations is a incontrovertible defeater, which of course it is not. It's like him saying that a birthday party never happened just because the guests don't completely agree on who attended, whether the cake was chocolate, or if there was a pinata.
Except, of course, that the birthday person is known to exist, we can find out with certainty what flavor of cake it was, and there are first hand eye witnesses to the party.
Other than that, fine analogy.
Sigh.
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam
