Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 26, 2025, 2:55 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Simulation Theory according to Dilbert
#44
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert
(May 1, 2017 at 9:24 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:
(April 29, 2017 at 7:51 am)Little lunch Wrote: The problem with this theory, for me, is that if our present thoughts create the past in this simulation, then we may have only just been switched on, as a program.

This a problem for presentism as well, even apart from simulation theory. Then there is the proven science of retrocausation, to which I believe Scott Adams linked. This seems to bridge the presentism/eternalism divide (albeit in a very perplexing way) by suggesting that all moments of time are 'present' but all change in response to one another. Even what is currently present is indeterminate to a future present...wrap you mind around that one over a party bowl.

AND, when you cant flat out quote your comic book, you try to debunk science, when you cant do that you try to get science to point to your comic book, and now you cant do that, so you try to sound compromising just to lead people back to your comic book. 

And you are still stuck with the countless god claims and religions in human history and still stupidly think you got the correct one. 

Allah and Jesus sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G, first comes love, then comes marriage then comes Yahweh PRIOR TO EITHER OF YOU, which was a character stolen from the prior Canaanite polytheism.

So all this word salad proves what? That Buddha is the way to truth? Vishnu maybe? How about Apollo? 

It cant be that humans merely make this shit up because 99% of the time they spread it because their parents sold it to them? It cant be that religion is merely sold, not proven. It cant be that humans simply made bad guesses. It cant be that religion and god claims are nothing but an artificial construct humans invent to create social order and to falsely give themselves a sense of a fictional forever.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Neo-Scholastic - April 28, 2017 at 12:08 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 28, 2017 at 1:45 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by brewer - April 28, 2017 at 6:26 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 28, 2017 at 8:32 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 8:43 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 28, 2017 at 9:02 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 29, 2017 at 12:17 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by brewer - April 29, 2017 at 7:20 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Angrboda - April 28, 2017 at 4:22 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 5:06 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 4:47 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 6:27 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Angrboda - April 28, 2017 at 7:16 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 8:11 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Aoi Magi - April 29, 2017 at 3:35 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 4:37 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 8:12 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - May 1, 2017 at 5:06 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 4:30 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 5:03 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 6:33 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 30, 2017 at 6:31 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by chimp3 - April 30, 2017 at 8:59 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 30, 2017 at 5:38 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 3, 2017 at 12:19 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 5, 2017 at 11:51 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 5, 2017 at 12:25 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 5, 2017 at 12:55 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 8, 2017 at 12:04 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Star Trek theory Won2blv 10 2774 June 24, 2023 at 6:53 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Intelligent Design as a scientific theory? SuperSentient 26 7882 March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Last Post: SuperSentient
  Simulation Theory Documentary Neo-Scholastic 25 7110 August 30, 2016 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  New theory on how life began KUSA 19 4844 March 3, 2016 at 6:33 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  New theory on Aboigenesis StuW 11 4598 February 26, 2015 at 4:11 pm
Last Post: Heywood
  Can you give any evidence for Darwin's theory? Walker_Lee 51 12779 May 14, 2014 at 11:30 am
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Creationists: Just a theory? Darwinian 31 8931 October 26, 2013 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  PZ Myers destroys Daniel Friedmann's YEC theory little_monkey 1 1362 June 17, 2013 at 10:56 am
Last Post: Silver
  Big Bang theory confirmed (apparently) and amendments to make Joel 2 2133 March 21, 2013 at 8:28 pm
Last Post: Joel
Thumbs Up Does Death Exist? New Theory Says ‘No’ Phish 30 15863 March 13, 2013 at 7:06 pm
Last Post: ManMachine



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)