Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 29, 2025, 3:36 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Simulation Theory according to Dilbert
#57
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert
(May 3, 2017 at 4:32 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: When some skeptics use the term anecdote usually they do so as a way to dismiss personal statements about that do not fit in with how they think the world 'should' work.  Except 90% of what history is made of is anecdotes - letters, inscriptions, records, artifacts, etc.  For example, if I think my ancestors came from Reading, England to Wheaton, Illinois sometime around the turn of the century, then I would expect to find them listed in the census around that time. And lo and behold, I did find them. Theory confirmed.

My point is that anything that happened in the past is a reconstruction. We cannot go back and run experiments in the past. Evolution and geology are basically history. You cannot run an experiment about speciation any more than you can for the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. All you can do is see if new information fits together with what is already known.

The content in the letters, inscriptions, records, and such may be anecdotes (testimonials), yes. But this isn't to say that such objects cannot be scientific evidence as well. It depends on the scientific hypothesis/theory at hand and what the hypothesis/theory predicts.

For example: if some scientific theory says that one should expect to see certain fossils in these layers here rather than in the layers over there, then the fossil record would constitute scientific evidence if these certain fossils do happen to be found in these layers and not in other layers.

I would say the example you gave does suggest that what the census lists is evidence that your ancestors came from a certain area to another at a certain time, and it would certainly be a much better evidence than a mere anecdote from one of your relatives. But it would also be good to do some dating analysis of the census manuscript (based on the science of dating methods) to determine when it was written just to strengthen the collective evidence for your claim. The more evidence, the better, provided they're not merely anecdotes/testimonials (because anyone can say anything really, so it's not much support if any).
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Neo-Scholastic - April 28, 2017 at 12:08 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 28, 2017 at 1:45 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by brewer - April 28, 2017 at 6:26 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 28, 2017 at 8:32 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 8:43 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 28, 2017 at 9:02 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 29, 2017 at 12:17 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by brewer - April 29, 2017 at 7:20 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Angrboda - April 28, 2017 at 4:22 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 5:06 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 4:47 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 6:27 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Angrboda - April 28, 2017 at 7:16 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Brian37 - April 28, 2017 at 8:11 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Aoi Magi - April 29, 2017 at 3:35 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 4:37 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 8:12 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 4:30 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 5:03 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 29, 2017 at 6:33 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 30, 2017 at 6:31 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by chimp3 - April 30, 2017 at 8:59 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - April 30, 2017 at 5:38 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 3, 2017 at 12:19 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by Grandizer - May 3, 2017 at 5:23 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 5, 2017 at 11:51 am
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 5, 2017 at 12:25 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 5, 2017 at 12:55 pm
RE: Simulation Theory according to Dilbert - by John V - May 8, 2017 at 12:04 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Star Trek theory Won2blv 10 2788 June 24, 2023 at 6:53 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Intelligent Design as a scientific theory? SuperSentient 26 7910 March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Last Post: SuperSentient
  Simulation Theory Documentary Neo-Scholastic 25 7164 August 30, 2016 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  New theory on how life began KUSA 19 4854 March 3, 2016 at 6:33 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  New theory on Aboigenesis StuW 11 4607 February 26, 2015 at 4:11 pm
Last Post: Heywood
  Can you give any evidence for Darwin's theory? Walker_Lee 51 12798 May 14, 2014 at 11:30 am
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Creationists: Just a theory? Darwinian 31 8955 October 26, 2013 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  PZ Myers destroys Daniel Friedmann's YEC theory little_monkey 1 1365 June 17, 2013 at 10:56 am
Last Post: Silver
  Big Bang theory confirmed (apparently) and amendments to make Joel 2 2140 March 21, 2013 at 8:28 pm
Last Post: Joel
Thumbs Up Does Death Exist? New Theory Says ‘No’ Phish 30 15874 March 13, 2013 at 7:06 pm
Last Post: ManMachine



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)