Simulation Theory according to Dilbert

[John V]

If you're referring to tiktaalik: not at all. If they didn't find anything (and IIRC they didn't on the first trip or two), they could blame the incompleteness of the fossil record. When it turned out it was younger than actual tetrapods, they just noted that intermediate species don't necessarily die out. They heralded it as good evidence when it seemed that way, but they had their outs ready if they needed them. That's how it goes with evolution.

Tiktaalik prediction falsified, yes or no? OF COURSE if it's falsified it's for reasons, no matter what is falsified in any field whatsoever.

Falsified, yes. Risky, no - they had outs.