Simulation Theory according to Dilbert

[Amarok]

Indeed one falsified fossil will not take down evolution. But I find it hilarious he cheery picks from talkorgins while ignoring all the stuff that shows evolutionary biology fits the most rigid definition of science

To be clear, it was the proposed timeline that was falsified (the earlier end of the timeline for tetrapods). Which, as you said, no big deal anyway, since the theory of evolution can stand even with the proposed timeline being wrong.

Fact is there's just too much solid evidence to refer to when it comes to evolution, it's been put to the test so many times and yet keeps passing them, and multiple independent fields of inquiry all converge to the same conclusion which is evolution. So it's irrational at this point to keep disagreeing with the evolutionary science. You can challenge certain specific details here and there, but evolution broadly speaking has been conclusively established a scientific fact.

Here here

These fools confuse priest who spew gospel . For truth seekers who want to understand

They confuse hearsay and fables by goat herders with a real method to sift fact from fiction

They confuse the people with the method and try to lower science to the level of religion

Absurd

and Indeed a specific timeline was shown false . Which most certainly doesn't challenge any of the central idea's of modern synthesis. And they call the explanation of the phenomenon an "OUT". Also the ignorance of paleontology trying to compare it to a bunch of legends  mixed with the tired blurb "It's historical science "(creationist crap) just makes one sad.