(May 16, 2017 at 10:18 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:(May 16, 2017 at 10:17 am)SteveII Wrote: The definition of free will Stawson gives is so restrictive as to make the term meaningless.
Wrong. It's a classic incompatabilist definition of free will.
THat does not change the fact that redefining free will so that it is impossible for a person to have it is not proof that a person does not have free will.