(June 29, 2017 at 8:07 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: You bring up an old out of date layman's book I raise you an actual scientist
Oh and as for Alex he's not running away he's knows more about this stuff in his sleep then you know at your best
Oh and here is Carroll spanking someone using the same nonsense you are
http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2014/02/24/post-debate-reflections/
Alex doesn't know what he's talking about. I've already demonstrated that in this thread. No amount of cheerleader is going to change that. For instance, he doesn't understand what a singularity is. That's a very basic concept.
Second, Stephen Hawking is an actual scientist.
Third, Carroll didn't spank anyone in that debate. He got spanked. But if you want to explain to me how he won that debate, I'm all ears.
Fourth, what part of your video is relevant to this discussion? Carrol is throwing out a bunch of possibilities and claims, but possibilities and bare claims are cheap. I'm interested in what is plausible, evidence based, and reasonable. At the end of the video he talks about the multiverse, but he admits there's no evidence for it--so it might as well be called metaphysics at that point. David Gross, nobel prize winner, thinks the multiverse is bullshit and equates it to "it smells of angels." According to him, most physicists are uncomfortable with this type of empirically baseless metaphysical thinking in science.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEx5rWfz2ow
