RE: Matter and energy can be past-eternal
July 1, 2017 at 1:08 am
(This post was last modified: July 1, 2017 at 1:14 am by Amarok.)
1. You have not argued you have asserted and done nothing but assert .
2. As credentials where are yours again ?
3. What was that about self made qualifications ?
4. Well engage with the arguments when there YOUR arguments
But you have been refuted because you got the date of a book wrong . apparently
Considering I listed at least on physicist who does not agree with Hawkings and another who disagrees with Yesmens definition of singularity .......
2. As credentials where are yours again ?
3. What was that about self made qualifications ?
4. Well engage with the arguments when there YOUR arguments
(July 1, 2017 at 1:00 am)Alex K Wrote: @MoY
Are you mad, of course I'm not posting any sort of ID here to prove something to random ppl. Let it go, we can either talk about things like normal people, or not. In your case it's no fun.
But you have been refuted because you got the date of a book wrong . apparently
Quote:Bullshit. I'm saying there a lot of cosmologists, and it's not possible for you to have either read or communicated with most of them. You'll need to demonstrate the truth of your assertion that most cosmologists share Hawking's view of the beginnings of the Universe, or moderate your assertion with something more intellectually honest, like: "In my limited experience as an amateur physics enthusiast, it seems to me that. .
Considering I listed at least on physicist who does not agree with Hawkings and another who disagrees with Yesmens definition of singularity .......

Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb