(August 8, 2017 at 2:09 pm)A Theist Wrote:(August 8, 2017 at 1:59 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Imagine the environmental impact statement for a nuclear detonation of random yield, in a random US location at a random time and during random weather conditions.
The mind reels . . . .
NOKO's just getting started. The U.S. has been developing nuclear weapons and building its arsenal since the 1940s. I just hope that fat little Kimmy boy isn't stupid enough to launch a strike at our forces in SOKO or at the U.S. mainland. We have the capability to totally flatten North Korea and reduce it to a burned out cinder numerous times over.
You are still not getting it. If you are going to rightfully point out Un being dangerous and having no concept of mutual destruction then that cuts both ways. Even if we shoot of nukes in response to them shooting them off, that could result in a domino effect where other enemies do the same. Using nukes could start WW3 and if that were to happen you better fucking hope you are under the mushroom cloud and get vaporized because if you think the west would come up roses and stay in tact you are delusional. A worldwide nuclear war could wipe our species out DUMBASS.
This is no John Wayne movie where the good guy wins when you talk of using nukes. NOBODY wins no matter who shoots first.
You better hope that if there were a conflict we could hit them first before anything reaches us, then hope we have an agreement with China over a conventional war. That would be the only way our species would survive. The better option is diplomacy.