North Korea Backs Down

[Drich]

Just as I thought they would.  Kim backs down.



http://thehill.com/policy/defense/346566...eat-report

No kidding, and that is what that family has always done, which is why nobody today can give me any good alternative that 45 could claim he could do that the presidents of the past 50 years of BOTH parties have not tried.

But please do not post this as 45 deserving any credit. I'd place that more on his baby sitters pulling him aside and bitch slapping him behind closed doors.

when have they backed down??? We tell them not to create nuke, they do, we tell them not to develop icbm's they do, we tell them not to test nukes they do, we tell them not to launch the ICbms they do we tell them not to put the war heads on the icbms they do...

So when the FF's has this family backed down ever? to obama, bush clinton or even regan?

Here's the thing.. They never backed down because China has always had their back. It wasn't till trump came along and upset china's apple cart/got china to believe that we do not care if they have the N.Korean's back or not, we will not be spat on by this little dictator. While most of you were looking at the exchange between Kim and Trump, Trump was using those exchanges to make China act.

China made Kim back off, because Trump scared the Chinese government. Something never done before.

---

He's such a troll

^^^

He's been making idle, toothless threats since he gained power.

Doesn't surprise me.

^^^^media propaganda.

Un has delivered on every threat he has made up untill this last one, where Trump backed Him down via China.

---

The fuckhead Kim backed down. Barack opened his big ass mouth and threatened Assad with a " Red Line" if he used chemical weapons. Assad saw Barack for the coward he was and used chemical weapons anyway. There's a beautiful never used Red Line you can buy for very cheap, because it never worked.

You know how in 1864, Ulysses Grant kept losing skirmishes but kept advancing,  while Robert Lee kept winning skirmishes but had to keep retreating towards Richmond?  It was not Grant who had to surrender at Appomattox.

Guam is an insignificant skirmish where we won, but while losing the skirmish Kim advanced his nuclear capability, while we retreated.   Kim will soon be able to hit our Richmond, the continental US, with nuclear weapons.

The difference between trump in North Korea and Obama in Syria, is obama's back was not against Richmond.

Are you retarded???

Guam was made and held as an american Territory before and since WWII because it has tremoundous strategic value. that is why out B-2 Spirit stealth bomber fleet is stationed there as well as a naval port and marines. it is the hub to the whole south pacific and Asia. Even out missile defense systems are located there (you know what would shoot down a nuke ttack launched from asia at our west coast.) That us why Un wanted to destroy gaum. It is one of several hub type base that leaves the US main land open for attack.

---

The fuckhead Kim backed down. Barack opened his big ass mouth and threatened Assad with a " Red Line" if he used chemical weapons. Assad saw Barack for the coward he was and used chemical weapons anyway. There's a beautiful never used Red Line you can buy for very cheap, because it never worked.

Um no asshole, Obama couldn't do shit because the GOP obstructed him on everything, not just Syria.

:Bwahahah:
And no one is obstructing trump, that must be why He gets it done...

---

Not really. They never intended a first strike in the first place, just to show an increasingly belligerent US* that they now had nukes and could deliver them a serious distance, to Guam, say. Once that was done, there really was no point stoking the flames further.

Precisely.

It takes a considerable amount of willful stupidity to think this was ever anything else. So of course Trump's slack-jawed supporters will clap and bark on cue, as the Great Leader pats himself on the back for forcing Kim to do what he was always going to do anyway. 

Again.. provide one instance where we/obama or bush told Un to back down and He did.

Dude never backed down because he thought china always would have his back.

"Trump's rhetoric" has unnerved the Chinese enough to tell either side if the start something China will not back them. Trump bluff/rhetoric says he does not care, which has china doubble down on sanctions to north korea and start moving from them. It is this pressure that has UN backing down, not because he was going to anyway.

Think about it.. why would UN uset the only country willing to deal with Him if he was always planning to back down?