RE: Clinton Interview
September 13, 2017 at 4:42 pm
(This post was last modified: September 13, 2017 at 4:42 pm by Whateverist.)
(September 13, 2017 at 4:31 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote:(September 13, 2017 at 4:27 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Yeah, I'd prefer that she keep her negatives down and her positives up. You know, get elected.
I'd prefer FBI directors not release statements that make it seem like she was under a new investigation. You know, stay out of the political sphere as part of the judicial system and not inadvertently sway public opinion and cost someone an election.
I'd prefer conservative pundits, politicians, and blow-hards not spend 3 decades trying character assassination attempt after attempt to discredit a political rival, including (but not limited to) investigation after investigation into "scandals" that were anything but.
It was a bad political move, probably shouldn't have said it. But that comment didn't cost her the election.
I hear you. I voted for her and she didn't say anything that alienated me. However, whether or not she will, I'm willing to consider the possibility that the way she campaigned was not strategic. Democrats -or someone that isn't a complete atrocity- needs to learn how to win an election.
I'm also pretty sure that she isn't the answer any more. I hope not to need to give her my vote again.