Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 15, 2025, 4:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The "Complexity of the Eye", for stupid creationists.
#1
The "Complexity of the Eye", for stupid creationists.
"How did the eye suddenly appear?"

Well, moron, "suddenly" doesn't apply.

530-million-year-old fossil has look of world's oldest eye, study suggests
Date: December 7, 2017
Source: University of Edinburgh
Summary: A 530-million-year-old fossil contains what could be the oldest eye ever discovered, a study reveals.

Quote:A 530-million-year-old fossil contains what could be the oldest eye ever discovered, a study reveals.

The remains of an extinct sea creature include an early form of the eye seen in many of today's animals, including crabs, bees and dragonflies, researchers say.

Scientists made the finding while examining the well-preserved fossil of a hard-shelled species -- called a trilobite. These ancestors of spiders and crabs lived in coastal waters during the Palaeozoic era, between 541-251 million years ago.

They found the ancient creature had a primitive form of compound eye -- an optical organ that consists of arrays of tiny visual cells, called ommatidia, similar to those of present-day bees.

The team, which included a researcher from the University of Edinburgh, say their findings suggest that compound eyes have changed little over 500 million years.

The right eye of the fossil -- which was unearthed in Estonia -- was partly worn away, giving researchers a clear view inside the organ. This revealed details of the eye's structure and function, and how it differs from modern compound eyes.
The species had poor vision compared with many animals today, but it could identify predators and obstacles in its path, researchers say.

Its eye consists of approximately 100 ommatidia, which are situated relatively far apart compared to contemporary compounds eyes, the team says.

Unlike modern compound eyes, the fossil's eye does not have a lens. This is likely because the primitive species -- called Schmidtiellus reetae -- lacked parts of the shell needed for lens formation, the team says.
Continues...
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The "Complexity of the Eye", for stupid creationists. - by Gawdzilla Sama - December 7, 2017 at 5:03 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Bug Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution, It Never Happe QuackeryDetection 11 2571 May 14, 2022 at 9:19 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Are Americans Just Stupid? Silver 42 6398 October 11, 2020 at 10:08 pm
Last Post: Ranjr
  Creationists! Eat Your Broccoli ! chimp3 22 4501 October 17, 2019 at 7:06 am
Last Post: Cod
  Tips on how to boost eye health purplepurpose 24 4329 March 3, 2018 at 8:52 pm
Last Post: AFTT47
  The Missing Link and the Irreducible Complexity of the Eye Rhondazvous 73 28447 June 8, 2017 at 6:57 am
Last Post: Amarok
  Single celled creature with functioning eye. downbeatplumb 19 7582 December 14, 2015 at 2:58 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Bionic eye implant world first zebo-the-fat 12 4677 July 22, 2015 at 2:58 pm
Last Post: QuarkDriven
  Stupid Virus Discovered in People popeyespappy 0 1221 November 11, 2014 at 11:09 am
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Intelligent Design: Irreducible Complexity? OfficerVajardian 49 16433 August 17, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  How to Piss-Off Creationists 101: OfficerVajardian 16 5365 August 16, 2014 at 2:25 am
Last Post: Zidneya



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)