(May 9, 2009 at 6:04 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Blimey, you're a broken record EvF. THERE IS reason, just you don't make the reasoning where I do.
I understand this (at least in an academic sense) ...
(May 9, 2009 at 6:04 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Evidence has been discounted unless you can counter the logic presented... that you'd need god like measuring tools to view the evidence. If you cannot counter this logic, then you can't keep repeating the evidence line. It's presently debunked.
... but I don't agree with this.
IOW I agree that your reasoning makes absolute sense to you but I don't agree that our line of questioning (of attack if you wish) is wrong or, indeed, that you can consider it "debunked" ... in essence you've made a claim (to view evidence for "God" you need the appropriate godlike tools) but that relies on the truth of God's existence which is far from proven or even accepted.
In essence it puts us right back at the extraordinary claim ... you've made one but you need extraordinary evidence to support the claim.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
