RE: From where do you get your information ?
January 9, 2018 at 6:29 am
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2018 at 6:51 am by vulcanlogician.)
Perhaps read them critically rather than avoiding them.
Edit: @notimportant
WLC is okay. In my opinion he's not worthy to lick the salt off John Hick's nuts though. Totally different class of thinker.
Hick is no apologist. He could give a shit about proving god's existence. He writes remarkably insightful commentaries on what he thinks the true nature of God is.
If you can, check out "A Rational Basis for Theistic Belief" by Hick-- short essay, easy read
Edit: @notimportant
(January 9, 2018 at 6:29 am)Grandizer Wrote: By the way, most here won't agree with me on this, but I think William Lane Craig is very good with the logic, and not just rhetoric. But it doesn't help that he's sneaky and skews things in his favor. Plantinga comes off as more honest. Never heard of Hick, but I'll give his words a check next time I'm in reading mode.
WLC is okay. In my opinion he's not worthy to lick the salt off John Hick's nuts though. Totally different class of thinker.
Hick is no apologist. He could give a shit about proving god's existence. He writes remarkably insightful commentaries on what he thinks the true nature of God is.
If you can, check out "A Rational Basis for Theistic Belief" by Hick-- short essay, easy read
