RE: Will you share your food (serious question)
January 11, 2018 at 4:06 pm
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2018 at 4:07 pm by vulcanlogician.)
(January 11, 2018 at 11:50 am)DLJ Wrote: Interesting. But poorly worded.
I fell at the first hurdle. I chose the option stating that there is no moral obligation to rescue the child.
It's very precise in its wording, but it's trying to weed out moral nihilists from the git go. A lot of ethics thought experiments fall flat if there is no moral obligation driving one choice over another. To just see the ideas put plainly (no interactive elements) go here:
https://openborders.info/drowning-child/
or watch this:


