(January 15, 2018 at 7:30 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: I’m calling troll on this one.
I disagree. Post-bong-hit, Agnosty's posts make perfect sense. There are problems with logic, yes. But I don't think this is trolling. I think the issue here is that Agnosty has something significant to say, but he struggles in articulating it, and also (to his detriment) makes claims about empiricism and science that don't hold water.
It's coming across as deepity, but it's more like "confused profundity." Maybe I'm wrong about that, but I stand by my non-troll statements.