(January 15, 2018 at 11:51 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: I disagree. Post-bong-hit, Agnosty's posts make perfect sense. There are problems with logic, yes.
What?!? Problems with logic? Dispense with the illustrations or can the allegations. You're talking out your backside and doing a mighty poor job convincing me to hang around with this unsubstantiated indictment and slanderous censure.
Quote:I think the issue here is that Agnosty has something significant to say, but he struggles in articulating it,
Articulation is precarious, especially if consideration is given to the foggy perspicacity of the audience.
Quote:and also (to his detriment) makes claims about empiricism and science that don't hold water.More unsubstantiated conjecture.
Quote:It's coming across as deepity, but it's more like "confused profundity."All calumny aside, first inspect your comprehension for holes before judging my depth.
This is your idea of "cordial conversation"? Baseless slurs against my acuity? The sole reason I remain is at your request and if anyone seriously suspects me of trolling, I can answer that promptly in action.
It's abundantly clear there is nothing to be gained in the company of such dogmatic lot resorting to reflective ad hominous attacks completely in lieu of sapiophilic aspiration. I'm a glutton for punishment in offering one more chance to shelve the ad homs as I have no evidence to foundation a belief that anyone here can operate in otherwise manner. One more time and I'll shake the dust from my shoes and return you to your echochamber for which you apparently long.
Quote:Then again, I jumped in rather late, so maybe I’m jumping the gun.Obviously.
Quote:Likely another nutter who thinks he's found a brilliant argument for godFrom the adhominator whose brilliant response was "TL;DR". I loathe to imagine what miserable person you are in real life to be such an ogre online.