So it's an argument from ignorance if I call you out on making bald assertions that you are unwilling to back up?
Right, so when you say 'evolution made women so that men could dominate them', what you are specifically saying is that women evolved to be weaker than men so they can be forcefully raped?
Nice.
Also citation required.
(Or is asking for a citation an 'argument from ignorance' on my part?)
(January 26, 2018 at 11:22 am)alpha male Wrote:(January 26, 2018 at 11:10 am)Mathilda Wrote: and not providing a citation for your assertion that 'evolution made women so that men could dominate them.
I thought the logic was obvious, but if you need a roadmap: The main purpose (so to speak) of a species per evolution is procreation. Males being larger and stronger makes that purpose more likely to be achieved, i.e. if females aren't willing, males can overpower them.
Right, so when you say 'evolution made women so that men could dominate them', what you are specifically saying is that women evolved to be weaker than men so they can be forcefully raped?
Nice.
Also citation required.
(Or is asking for a citation an 'argument from ignorance' on my part?)