(January 26, 2018 at 1:37 pm)alpha male Wrote:(January 26, 2018 at 1:22 pm)Mathilda Wrote: I notice that AM is arguing that women evolved to be weaker so they can be raped rather than men evolved to be stronger to better attract women. Despite plenty of examples of that happening in nature, e.g. stags rutting etc. And despite the fact that it wouldn't actually work that way because the female of the species would lose the ability to select for superior genes.
Forced copulation (what rape is called for species other than humans) is a known behavior:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication...al_Kingdom
Tornados and cancer exist too, doesn't mean the victim wants to be affected by them.
Yes rape exists and? I really hope you are NOT arguing that atheists advocate rape.
Humans also look for cures for cancer. Criminologists and psychiatrists interview BOTH rape victims and their perps, to figure out tactics and motives, which is why we know that rape isn't about sex, sexuality but power and control.
The real irony is that your bible DOES NOT condone rape. In fact, it treats girls as property at best, so if a female is "deflowered" without the father's permission, the male whom has done such, gets a penalty fine to be paid to the family. The psychological trauma to the female is not addressed in the bible. THAT IS because BACK THEN females WORLDWIDE in every religion were considered property, not equals.
YOU WILL NOT find the words "Thall shalt not rape" in that book.