(January 30, 2018 at 5:40 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: He said generally females . Not human females all females . And then put it in an evolutionary context . The spider blows the presumption away .
I tried to use male/female rather than man/woman because, in an evolutionary context, dimorphism may have arisen in human ancestors. I think most people probably understood that I wasn't referring to spiders. I understand that dimorphism isn't all in one direction. Dimorphism in species with larger females probably arose through different dynamics, don'tcha think?