(February 22, 2018 at 8:38 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Because in one scenario they (sic) fetus was born . And killing can be justified. And it's not murder murder is unlawful .
Not his body his say ends at ejaculation . After that he can go fuck himself
Quote:Why do capable and loving grandparents, four of them, have no "choice" in this matter of butchering an innocent unborn grandchild?Not their bodies
Quote:The answer is not blowing in the wind. The answer is that Norma McCorvey lied when she claimed to have been raped. She was not, and therefore the decision in Roe v. Wade was based on falsified testimony and it should be overturned summarily.It's irrelevant even if she did lie. The law stands on it's (sic) merit .
If by intolerant you mean we don't pout (sic) up with sanctimonious bigots who cloak their bullshit in religious wrapping paper. And generally favour people who don't have these unfortunate qualities then yes yes we are .
1. The baby being aborted is not the body of the murderous woman having it killed.
2. His "say" does not "end at ejaculation" if the woman has a baby. He pays child support for 18 years, notwithstanding your ignorant profanity.
3. There IS no "merit" to a judicial decision when it is based on false testimony.
Don't you know anything? Such cases are overturned often.
