RE: Any thoughts on SE Cupp's take on Hillary and Melania?
March 28, 2018 at 3:29 pm
(This post was last modified: March 28, 2018 at 3:29 pm by Whateverist.)
(March 28, 2018 at 2:11 pm)vorlon13 Wrote:(March 28, 2018 at 12:26 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'm sure she has her rea$ons for sticking with the WLB. In both cases, it is a private matter between husband and wife.
Well . . . .
Not quite. Trump IS pandering to the religious folks, and the religious folks have rules and commandments and dogma and strictures and laws and edicts on all manner of topics. One might expect Trump to comport himself perhaps a little better to save his followers and voters and supporters embarrassment and charges of hypocrisy. The pandering thing SHOULD work both ways, after all.
I also note, while unlikely, should the US congress deem Ivana Trump First Lady over Melania, Biblically, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. It would be interesting to see the fundamentalists and evangelicals reaction to such a pro-Bible move from our other wise base and corrupt congress. I presume Donald Trump's reaction would be interesting too.
But surely you don’t really think xtians are moral? They’re i it for the sin and forgiveness. Shame is for the people they disagree with.