RE: SCOTUS Tells Anti-Abortion Nuts To Go Fuck Themselves
April 7, 2018 at 1:23 pm
(This post was last modified: April 7, 2018 at 1:27 pm by John V.)
(April 7, 2018 at 12:45 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: I’m talking about having a moral discussion.
Yes, and moral discussions involve judgments. When you opine that something is moral or immoral, you're judging.
Quote:Having cake and eating it too? Yeah, it is a bit like that, I guess. How can we preserve a woman’s bodily autonomy without diminishing the value of human life? I never said I had all the answers. Maybe there is no perfectly, morally right solution. But my point about Tres was that women should get to have sex for pleasure just as men do.
And, as I've said, I have nothing against (and in the case of my wife am extremely in favor of) women having sex for pleasure.
HOWEVER...when weighing the value of human life against the freedom to have sex for pleasure, I'm siding with the value of human life. Once you come to the position that the unborn baby is indeed human life, as you have (at least in some circumstances), I don't see how you can choose otherwise.
(April 7, 2018 at 12:50 pm)Tres Leches Wrote: I'm still not certain what your impetus was for the "keep your legs shut" comment
Something I never actually said.
The impetus for my uterus comment was, obviously, your uterus comment, specifically the irony of it.
Quote:other than remarkably inflammatory snark. If that's it, so be it - just another day on the web.
But I can only surmise that if you actually knew me as a person rather than a bunch of 0's and 1's, you'd be deeply ashamed of your comments.
-Teresa
It's amazing how sensitive you guys are. The comment was very mild compared to what Christians get here on a daily basis.
