(April 7, 2018 at 2:15 pm)alpha male Wrote:(April 7, 2018 at 2:07 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Sure, yes. What I am attempting to differentiate here is one individual’s subjective moral judgement versus having that open dialogue as a society and arriving at a collectively agreed upon moral fact.
Sounds nice, but your actions don't line up with that. The fact is that you don't have abortion without a pregnancy, and you don't have a pregnancy without sex. That's relevant to the dialogue. Yet, when I alluded to that, you started crying slut-shamer and took the discussion way off track.
Do you have a problem with nuance? I thought we already agreed that it’s unfair and unreasonable to expect women to only have sex for the purposes of procreation. In other words, celibacy is not a realistic solution to unwanted pregnancies. Why aren’t we moving the discussion on from that point if we agree on it?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
