(April 21, 2018 at 9:04 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: There is actually a fallacy called the argument from nature. It doesn’t follow, that because it occurs in nature, that it is right to do so. Im sure that there are a lot of things in nature, which most ethical people would frown upon, when humans do it.
There is also a fallacy called equivocation. Although you didn’t state it outright you are trying equate homosexual behaviour in the animal world with the repulsive shit that animals get up to; infanticide, cannibalism and eating their pray alive.
Your 'argument from nature' is nothing more than a bastardisation of the 'Naturalistic Fallacy', you tortured it to make it say what you wanted. It's an old and oh so familiar fundie tactic.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.