(May 2, 2018 at 9:02 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(May 2, 2018 at 5:50 am)Wololo Wrote: Firstly I'd like to point out that the proposed debate topic sounds more like an item on a committee meeting agenda than a debate topic.
Secondly I'd like to point out that there's going to be a vast disconnect between Wooter's conception of his role here and his actilual role, vis Wooters "my role is to prove how stupid and misguided atheists are through my superior intellect and Thomas Aquinas". The rest of us "superior intellect? Ha! Your role is butt-monkey".
Why not wait for what he actually says rather than making something up in your head and criticising a strawman?
I've spent a couple of years reading what the says, trust me it doesn't change. He a condescsending, arrogant, little scut with severe authoritarian tendencies who has an unfortunate habit of assuming that something is right as soon as he says it. And he's got a huge crush on Thomas Aquinas for some strange reason.
Of course, you know all this being Wooters' biggest cheerleader.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home