Quote:I'm glad you found this again, I thought it was fun! Yeah you're probably right.. lets get practical
- philosophers observed the spiritual
- scientists observed fact
- Some people in both camps thought their observations crossed and fought over them
- others remained in their separate camps, admiring the other camps observations, wondering with bemusement at the squabbles in no mans land.
- No mans land is inhabited by atheists and creationists. Both are confused and think that scientific fact and spirituality are one subject.
Howzat?
Spirutal is what? Observing things and coming with "answers" that's not really answers and no evidence. Becuase evidence isn't suppose to be needed since you just can say that there is some other truths then scientific truth to be accepted because it's spiritual.
Then Wagga Wagga could easily be another truth.
Science have evidence of the answers that they prestent. Religious people don't have any, not any kind at all. But just saying that there is a god or some bigger meaning or high power seems to be enough.
- Science is not trying to create an answer like religion, it tries to find an answer.
