RE: A Book?
May 18, 2009 at 4:30 pm
(This post was last modified: May 18, 2009 at 4:31 pm by fr0d0.)
Well seems to me you've all firmly camped in no mans land with the Creationists. There was no need for the theatricals to prove it.
Yeah I knew 'philosopher' was incorrect, I was hoping for some artistic leeway there. You all have no understanding of the subject of faith and so naturally make ill informed conclusions. That's not a good thing. That's ignorance.
If theologians don't make observations then what is the Bible all about? Precisely that. That you narrowly define 'observation' in a nazi like manner with science as the only descriptor is your problem, and not mine.
Spritism is superstition. Spirituality is another subject.
Like I've said, it's so convenient to dismiss something so easily.
Yeah I knew 'philosopher' was incorrect, I was hoping for some artistic leeway there. You all have no understanding of the subject of faith and so naturally make ill informed conclusions. That's not a good thing. That's ignorance.
If theologians don't make observations then what is the Bible all about? Precisely that. That you narrowly define 'observation' in a nazi like manner with science as the only descriptor is your problem, and not mine.
Spritism is superstition. Spirituality is another subject.
Like I've said, it's so convenient to dismiss something so easily.
