(May 19, 2009 at 3:35 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Then that firmly places you with the nutters Evie
A nutter for wanting evidence before he believes something.
Yeah, wow, that's insane, who'd be so ridiculous.... *ahem*
You say we have no grasp of the subject of faith, but it isn't a subject at all.
fr0d0 Wrote:If theologians don't make observations then what is the Bible all about?
Last time I looked, it was an internally inconsistent collection of stone age mythology, along with several disagreeing accounts of the life of a man for which there is no other historical evidence.
How is this related to any observation?
fr0d0 Wrote:Spirituality is another subject.
Since there's no reason to believe that humans have spirits, souls, whatever, I'd say spirituality is a non-subject. You can't study spirituality, there's no evidence to be gathered or observations to be made.
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip