To know only a perfect absolute judge can accurately maintain us if we have an accurate reality is something I argued for. I will rephrase it here.
It's because we are not objective judges to who we are, and even if we all are, we aren't absolute judges to who we are, that is we don't have an absolute perfect understanding to who we are.
And if we aren't that which sees the "program us" and we control a lot of our brain, then neither is our brain.
It's really simple to understand this.
And just because a conclusion to some premises is stated in the beginning doesn't mean it is a premise and not a conclusion of other premises.
Of course, this would not prove God without the other facts, that we do accurately exist, and to know that, you just have to love yourself enough
It's because we are not objective judges to who we are, and even if we all are, we aren't absolute judges to who we are, that is we don't have an absolute perfect understanding to who we are.
And if we aren't that which sees the "program us" and we control a lot of our brain, then neither is our brain.
It's really simple to understand this.
And just because a conclusion to some premises is stated in the beginning doesn't mean it is a premise and not a conclusion of other premises.
Of course, this would not prove God without the other facts, that we do accurately exist, and to know that, you just have to love yourself enough
